WEDNESDAY, June 18 (HealthDay News) -- Electronic medical record
systems are being touted as the wave of the future in health care
and communication, but only 17 percent of U.S. doctors have
embraced the technology, a new survey finds.
"When you use a good definition of what a record system is, very
few physicians appear to have one," said lead study author
Catherine M. DesRoches, at Massachusetts General Hospital's
Institute for Health Policy, in Boston.
The definition of a fully functional electronic medical record
system includes a patient's complete medical records, medication
lists, problems, and clinical notes from past visits. The doctor
can also order prescriptions, laboratory tests and radiology tests
electronically, DesRoches said.
In addition, the doctor can review lab results and view X-rays,
MRIs or other scans on the computer, DesRoches noted. There are
also warnings about inappropriate prescriptions or abnormal lab
results. And the systems remind the doctor when lab or screening
tests are needed.
For the survey, DesRoches and her colleagues surveyed 2,758
doctors nationwide about their use of electronic medical record
systems. The researchers found that 4 percent reported having a
fully functional system. An additional 13 percent said they had a
basic system.
The survey also found that primary care doctors and doctors with
large practices or those in hospitals or medical centers were more
likely to have electronic medical record systems. In addition,
doctors in the western region of the United States were more likely
to have such systems.
The findings, published online Wednesday, were expected to be
published in the July 3 edition of the
New England Journal of Medicine.
Doctors cited a number of barriers for not adopting an
electronic medical record system, including concern about cost and
return on investment, DesRoches said.
"They also worry about their system becoming obsolete," she
said. "They also worry that the system is going to go down, and
they will have a waiting room full of patients, and they can't get
to anyone's record."
But, she added, doctors who have these systems are very
satisfied with them. "It makes care more effective and efficient,"
she said.
DesRoches thinks that eventually, most doctors will adopt an
electronic system. In fact, the survey found that 40 percent of
those physicians who did not have an operational system said they
had purchased one but hadn't started to use it, or they planned to
buy one, she said.
Both Medicare and private insurance companies are pushing
doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems as a way of
monitoring quality of care, which will be a basis for reimbursement
levels, DesRoches noted.
One electronic medical records expert doesn't think this survey
truly reflects which physicians are using electronic systems or
takes into account the ultimate goal of computerized medical
care.
"What we are talking about is moving physicians into the
computer age," said C. Peter Waegemann, chief executive officer of
the Boston-based Medical Records Institute, which promotes the use
of electronic medical records. "We are changing the way physicians
practice medicine, from an intuitive art to a computer-guided,
computer-based care system."
Waegemann said that while only about 20 percent of doctors have
electronic record systems, the number varies by specialty and
region of the country.
"About 50 percent of family practitioners have electronic health
record systems. Among pediatricians, 40 to 50 percent have
systems," Waegemann said. "In states such as Massachusetts, New
York and California, you have maybe 40 to 50 percent
implementation. When you get to Mississippi and Idaho, you have
maybe 4 percent."
Electronic medical records are coming rapidly, Waegemann
predicted. Forces pushing their adoption include patient demand,
younger doctors who were trained with such systems and pressures
from the insurance industry.
Electronic records also make it easy for patients to send their
medical records directly to doctors and specialists, Waegemann
said, adding, "If physicians don't have such systems, patients will
go elsewhere."
More information
For more on medical records, visit the
American Medical Association.